Friday, April 3, 2009

Why Despite FASB's Efforts To The Opposite, MTM Change Is A Non-Event

Despite the financial stocks jumping the shark yesterday, and investors gobbling it all up happily, Richard Ramsden of GS says this is just a load of hot air.

Mark to market is not the bottom

Our views on banks do not change following the FASB mark to market rule changes. Our core view is that banks will not bottom until nonperforming asset growth decelerates. All of the data points we track in 1Q point to acceleration.

Mark to market accounting changes provide banks with a little bit of Tier 1 capital relief, less earnings volatility from securities impairments (OTTI) as banks now estimate the credit loss rather than take the mark to market charge, and maybe more flexibility in putting assets into Level 3 and marking to model.

Against that, however, we note: (1) investors are not focused on Tier 1, (2) for securities, ultimately the losses are what the losses are and if the bank is wrong it will come at a later date, and (3) we believe investors will look through increases in tangible common at the expense of a big increase in Level 3 assets. Also, to the extent that banks do mark up risky securities it will make PPIP even harder to execute as banks will be marked further from the bid.
Richard's prediction is that until non-performing assets decelerate there is no bottoming in sight for banks. The math: bank assets are going bad at a 3% annual rate while the rate of pre-provision earning is 2.5% for the industry, that is loans are going bad faster than banks earn money.
Looks like the FASB just sold they souls for pennies on the dollar.



Sphere: Related Content
Print this post

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Also, to the extent that banks do mark up risky securities it will make PPIP even harder to execute as banks will be marked further from the bid."

Not if they are bidding on their own assets through pimrock.

GlobalMacroSpeculator said...

GS is right. Banks are toast, no amount of accouting trickery will make the losses dissapear. TCE too low

Anonymous said...

Good read here:
http://www.housingwire.com/2009/04/02/more-glib-press-on-fasb/

In Debt We Trust said...

IASB agrees w/GS. They refused to follow FASB rule changes this morning.

http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/04/
debts-of-spenders-iasb-refuses-to.html

coronelcossack said...

"The math: bank assets are going bad at a 3% annual rate while the rate of pre-provision earning is 2.5% for the industry, that is loans are going bad faster than banks earn money." What happened to recoveries? After all the bank loans are secured and declines in housing and CRE prices are not 100% yet.