Showing posts with label Merrill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Merrill. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

REIT CBL's Brief And Painful Stay On The Goldman Sachs Conviction Buy List

For a good example of just how worthless of a tool for investors (and useful for persuading follow on offering "participation") the Goldman Sachs Conviction Buy list is, look no further than the recent performance of REIT CBL & Associates, coupled with the recommendations on the stock by Goldman Sachs REIT analyst Jonathan Habermann.

I present a recent stock performance chart, overlaid with Goldman's recommendations on the stock, which indicate that either i) the Conviction Buy list is completely useless, ii) Habermann is the worst momentum chaser in the world, or iii) nobody, least of all Wall Street professionals, has a clue how to value REITs, or iv) all of the above.



For those who may not follow Goldman's REIT recommendations, I will summarize what has happened with this name over the past 3 months:

On March 27, Habermann kept his existing Sell Rating on the stock ($2.28 that day), and lowered his target price on CBL from $3.00 to $2.50, providing the following explanation [highlights here and in all quotes mine]:
We lower our 6-month price target on regional mall REIT CBL & Associates $2.50 (from $3 previously) due to our concerns on a further deceleration in fundamentals given the company’s high middle-market exposure and average portfolio sales productivity. Our $2.50 price target now indicates a 30% discount (previously 15%) to our unchanged NAV estimate. Further, we expect B/C class mall owners to be disproportionately impacted by increasing store closings and tenant bankruptcies increase through the current downturn, and caution that occupancy could decline substantially from current levels. Our $2.50 price target, including the company’s 23.2% dividend yield, now implies a total return potential of 9%.
Amusingly, beginning that day, the stock started rapidly moving higher, hitting $4.44 on April 15, which would have been a short loss of 100% to anyone who listened to Haberman on March 27. Probably as a result of numerous angry clients calling and demanding to know why they are losing boatloads of cash (and likely getting margin calls from Goldman's own repo desk no less), on that same day Haberman, comes out with a new report, this time advising clients to Hold their CBL stocks, and gives a $4.00 target on the stock. In an accompanying report, Jonathan provides the following justification:
Key reasons for our Neutral rating [upgrade] on CBL include:

1. Easing of concerns over credit issues. We see less risk associated with CBL’s balance sheet for three key reasons. First, the company faces over $2bn of debt maturing through 2011, including the expiration of its $550mn secured credit facility next year. While we acknowledge the above average volume and a heavy weighting towards the near term, recent signs of liquidity in the capital markets have reduced CBL’s refinancing risk in our view. Second, most of the expiring debt (with the exception of the unsecured revolver in 2011) is in the form of mortgage debt held by life insurance companies, an avenue of lending which still seems to be alive (albeit, much reduced). Lastly, CBL has already cut the dividend and opted to pay 60% of the dividend in stock, eliminating the risk of further dilution to forward earnings.

2. Refinancing risk largely reflected in shares – CBL trades at 1.3X our 2009 FFO estimates, versus the regional mall peer group average of 5.5X. As mentioned above, we acknowledge the high volumes of debt to be refinanced over the next 2 years, including the heavily drawn secured and unsecured credit lines (due in 2010 and 2011 respectively). However, we believe these concerns are reflected in the current share price. Further, the company’s 8.7X leverage (we look at Debt to 2009E EBITDA) is roughly in-line with the REIT average, and well below retail peers including MAC and DDR. Yet, CBL shares are much less expensive.

3. Stay at Neutral for time being as fundamentals should decelerate further. We highlight that fundamentals could display a further moderation over the next 12 months, with NOI growth potentially falling below the company’s current outlook of a (1.5%)-(3%). While CBL's portfolio has already been impacted by a number of troubled retailers including Steve and Barry's, Linens 'n Things and Circuit City, we expect the pace of store closings to accelerate in 2009, particularly as weaker retailers concentrate operations at malls demonstrating highest sales productivity and attractive demographic profiles.
So basically, horrendous fundamentals but it is a little cheaper than comparable crappy REITs, and credit has thawed, plus insurance companies can't wait to lend more to CBL. Upgrade merited - brilliant. But let's continue.

A mere week later, on April 24, after CBL is squeezed another 100% higher, hitting $7.88, a panicking Haberman is now fielding all sorts of angry calls as clients (Fidelity: 6.24%, Vanguard: 3.97%, T Rowe Price 3.9%) are screaming at him for missing them a 400% appreciation opportunity in less than a month. So what does Jonathan do? He changes the rating on CBL from Hold to not just Buy, but Conviction List Buy. All this less than a month before he was telling anyone who cares to read his research that the stock is a Sell and is worth $2.50. And, in case anyone cares, he puts a $10 price target on the stock, 400% higher than the $2.50 target he put on it on March 27.
We upgrade regional mall REIT CBL & Associates to CL Buy (from Neutral) as we believe the shares are undervalued. Concerns over the company’s balance sheet have caused the stock to trade at 1-2X FFO. However we view the recent progress made on refinancing activity across the sector as serving to eliminate ‘‘bankruptcy risk’’ from several low multiple stocks. We believe CBL survives as liquidity conditions have improved, and the company now has options to raise capital through an equity raise and / or asset sales. Our new $10 price target (raised from $4 previously) assumes a multiple of 3.5X our 2009 FFO estimate and now reflects a premium to our $8 NAV (versus a discount previously).
Oh, so even if it still has the worst tenants in the world, just because the company's "bankruptcy risk" has been "eliminated", everyone should buy (and not just buy, but Conviction Buy) into the stock. Again - brilliant.

What else does Jonathan say:
1. Easing of concerns over credit issues. We view CBL’s balance sheet as better positioned for the near term versus general investor perception, as 2009 and 2010 maturities are manageable and largely held by life companies. Specifically, the company has $304mn maturing in 2009, and $1bn maturing in 2010 (including the credit line). A capital raise and modest amounts of asset sales should go a long way in aiding the company through this (exhibit 3). Giving us more comfort, loans maturing over the next two years are smaller in size ($50-$60mn on average) and held mainly by life companies. While we acknowledge the above average volumes of debt CBL faces 2011 and beyond, we do not think shares deserve to trade at as depressed a multiple due to availability of options mentioned above (equity raises and asset sales). Also, CBL has already cut the dividend and opted to pay 55% of the dividend in stock, eliminating the risk of a further reduction.

2. Fundamentals get worse, but who doesn’t know this? To be clear, we expect fundamentals to get worse with NOI growth potentially falling below the company’s current outlook of (1.5%) to (3%). In fact, we model in occupancy falling to 87% and flat rent spreads by year end 2010. However, CBL was one of the first mall REITs to experience declining fundamentals and the scenario has not improved since (i.e. for several quarters now). For this reason, we think a further deterioration in fundamentals is not unexpected, and likely reflected in current valuation.

3. Valuation reflects overly severe balance sheet issues. As mentioned, we view CBL as relatively well positioned in terms of refinancing needs over the next 2 years (see exhibit 3). We therefore find it hard to justify the severe discount the shares trade at, both to their longer term average of 9.5X, and to the current REIT multiple of 9.5X. We certainly recognize that longer term refinancing needs (especially in 2011 and beyond) could prevent the multiple from reverting to the company's longer term average of 10X. That said, we simply find it less compelling that the shares remain trading in the 1-2X range, especially if capital raising efforts outlined above occur over the next 3-6 months.
We encourage readers to re-re-re-reread paragraph 2. And when they have done that, to reread it some more. After all, this has the vetting of former investment bank and current SLP monopolist extraordinaire Goldman Sachs.

So, continuing - what happens? Well, the stock peaks that day. In all honesty, it retraces the level it had when Habermann put it on the CBL list twice, but never goes anywhere even close to $10.00, despite the bankruptcy risk being eliminated. Instead, what happens is that on June 9, a syndicate of REIT underwriters extraordinaire Merrill Lynch and Wachovia issue and successfully price 50 million shares of CBL stock at $6.00. Tangentially notable is that the Wachovia analyst on CBL is none other than Zero Hedge long time favorite, Jeffrey Donnelley, CFA. For those new to the story, we would like to remind how Mr. Donnelley upgraded Weingarten Resources, a REIT in which Wachovia was in the offering syndicate, less than 24 hours before Wachovia et al raised equity for the company. And somehow Mr. Donnelley is still a CFA. Zero Hedge is hoping our SEC readers pay particular attention as we disclose all these various underwriting stories.

But back to Mr. Habermann. Naive clients who assumed that "fool me twice" would never be applicable to them, and decided to purchase some CBL after it somehow had the magical Conviction List designation before the Buy (kinda like an M3 badge on a BMW) now find themselves furious after realizing that had they waited a mere month they could have bought the stock in the ML/Wachovia secondary at a 40% discount. One can only imagine the pleasant conversations on Mr. Habermann's hopefully unrecorded phone line that day.

So a visibly [or so one assumes, alas the author of this post was nowhere near Mr. Habermann at the time] shaken Mr. Haberman does what? He issues a report, this Monday, in which he goes for broke: "CBL - Mall REIT at a deep discount; Our top idea in REITs" [emphasis mine]. Yes ladies and gents, the company that less than three months was at the bottom of the Goldman reject/Sell pile, has emerged as Goldman's top REIT idea. Not like anyone cares at this point, but here is Mr. Habermann's attempts at salvaging something... anything out of this whole fiasco:
Our top investment idea remains middle-market mall REIT CBL & Associates (CBL). Our $10 price target is based on a 15% premium to our roughly $9/sh net asset value (NAV) estimate and indicates a total return potential of more than 60%. We favor the stock for several reasons:

(1) Attractive yield - the stock has a current cash yield of 7% which we think is safe;

(2) Attractive Valuation – CBL trades at just 3X our 2010 estimate, a sharp discount to the REIT average of 10X-11X and the stock’s longer-tern average of 10X; and

(3) The bad news is in our numbers - our current estimates already reflect our cautious near-term outlook and incorporate a 500-600 basis point dip in occupancy as well as rental rate declines.
Alas for Mr. Habermann and his few remaining clients, the stock does not budge and in fact drops subsequent to this report. All is lost.

But the piece de resistance? Today, a mere 2 days after CBL became Goldman's "top idea in REITs", Mr. Habermann throws in the towel and issues this:
"We are removing CBL from the Americas Conviction Buy List as we now see better opportunities across our broader financials universe. We are encouraged by recent efforts to manage near term balance sheet risk, but expect incremental restructuring activity to take place over a longer time frame, and therefore see fewer catalysts for near term outperformance."
Bravo, Jonathan, Bravo. Of course the Goldman analyst won't do something as stupid as actually issue a forward looking analysis, so the stock merely goes from Conviction List Buy to plain, old, boring Buy. In 2 weeks when the stock hits $4.50 it will likely be downgraded to a Hold, and in a month when it is back to $2.00, look for Goldman to brand it with the anti M3 - Conviction List Sell.

And now you know how and why stocks get their rating at Goldman Sachs.

At least there is a silver lining: it seems REIT permabulls Cohen & Steers managed to dump all their CBL shares... when CBL was trading at its lowest price.



Who is it again who claimed that the "best and brightest" work on Wall Street?

hat tip Ryan Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Merrill On REITs: "Just First Of Several Rounds Of Follow Ons"

Straight from the horse's mouth, viewers can gleen the most "unbiased" perspective on the strength of the REIT market, who the investors are who are so happy to throw their money on the REIT equity offering bandwagon, and just how many more waves (after waves) of follow ons can be expected.

Compliments of Ron Sturzenegger, MD and Global Head of Real Estate, Gaming and Lodging and Jeff Horowitz, Managing Director & Head of Americas Real Estate And Loding, both at Merrill/BofA.

Watch the propaganda free clip here.

hat tip Pat Sphere: Related Content

Monday, June 15, 2009

Has The Merrill REIT Equity Offering Well Run Dry?

In a surprising development on the REIT scene, today the Omaha World Herald announced that Merrill REIT group darling Simon Property Group is selling the Crossroad Mall in Omaha on 72nd and Dodge Streets. With tenants such as Finish Line, LensCrafters, Old Navy, Victoria' Secret and near bankruptcy Claire's, it is not too hard to see why the mall has fallen on hard times.

What is mildly troubling is that Crossroads is located less than three miles away from the famous Borsheim's store at 120 Regency Parkway where the annual BRK B share circle jerk takes place, and where Becky Quicky has a lifetime 100% discount.



What should be much more troubling (especially to holders of REIT stocks), is that instead of simply doing a tactical drive by follow on offering (we are talking $$$ peanuts here), SPG is forced to stoop to the level of actually selling assets for cash. What's wrong - not enough ammo left to institute a little REIT short squeeze? Someone is slipping.

Back to the mall - Omaha Herald notes that the price will be "market value" and that in 2002 the mall was appraised for $57.1 million "according to a JP Morgan" report. Add this to the increasingly larger number of CRE market tests currently percolating in the market place: someone may be very unpleasantly surprised with the price this (and other) mall fetches. Also, whatever happened with the whole premise that SPG would be an acquiror for real estate? Uhm, doesn't this refute both the "logic" of both NAREIT and the most recent Merrill upgrade, and I quote:
"We are moving from Neutral to Buy on Simon given the company’s opportunity to boost external growth (and improve SPG’s core U.S. portfolio) as they prepare to become a major player in the emerging “M&A” market in U.S. retail real estate."
Sooo.... Schmidt was actually referring to the company being a divestor of assets, not acquirer....honest mistake - now it all makes sense. Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Auto Supplier Shock Spreading, Now TRW

Last week it was Visteon, yesterday it was Lear, today it's TRW. The auto supplier whose secured credit facility has been on an unprecedented tear recently, filed an 8-K earlier announcing it will likely breach covenants, and not some time in 2013 (the same year the S&P is using for its fwd multiple calculation), but Q2! In other words, they have a mere 30 days before TRW will be the next auto supplier casualty. It is interesting that TRW management waited so long, before a) announcing just how bad things are and b) taking proactive steps to fix things. From the 8-K:
On June 2, 2009, TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) announced that it has initiated the process with its bank group to amend its primary credit facility. In light of the current industry conditions, it is unlikely that the Company will be in compliance with the financial covenants of its existing credit facility at the end of the second quarter of 2009 and, therefore, is seeking to amend certain terms of its primary credit agreement to position the Company for future covenant compliance through the current downturn. The Company expects to complete the amendment process prior to the end of the second quarter 2009.
Recently TRW said it had fully drawn down its revolver, with utilization now sitting at $1.3 billion. The credit facility is $2.5 billion in total, underwritten by upgrade specialists Merrill Lynch/BofA and JPM. It will be interesting to see if the Merrill auto equities team takes a page out of the REIT book, and upgrades TRW equity to "Once In A Lifetime Dodecatuple Super Strong Buy", with a $100 price target, generating a short squeeze, doing a follow on, pocketing 10% of the equity offering and having management use the proceeds to pay down its credit facility. Stranger things have been seen in the market recently. Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Merrill: "Retail REITs - Tough But Stabilizing"

In his first note released in the post Sakwa world, Craig Schmidt continues to attempt to restore confidence in retail REITs. It would, after all, seem prudent to bang clients' heads into their desks until they see the light at the end of the tunnel (oncoming bullet train?) at a time when the only cash, and equity value, REITs can create is by raising expensive, dilutive equity in order to repay the cheapest form of capital (that of secured loans previously held by Mr. Schmidt uber parent, Bank of America). This is especially true, after these same clients have plunked down about $20 billion in new equity in companies that at this point exist on fumes of hope, speculation and short covering. not surprisingly, the report comes just prior to Realtors's release which indicates that Commercial Real Estate activity in Q1 fell 4.8% from Q4 of 2008 and 12.9% year over year, while vacancy rates are poised to rise to 12.1% from 9.7% last year.

While the title is expected, even Mr. Schmidt is at a loss to present the REIT "green shoots" that would substantiate his note. Amsuingly, Schmidt quotes favorable restaurant trends to back up the stabilization thesis:
Some positive signs included Dr. Mark Zandi’s (Chief Economist, Moody’s economy.com) citing that restaurants reported stronger same store sales gains than supermarkets in the most recent period, which suggests an increase in consumer confidence. Additionally, retail trends, while still negative, have improved from 4Q08, which were so dramatically negative that retailers were behaving like “deer caught in the headlights.”
Now that people are rushing to Nobu, maxing out their Centurions and hoping, very much like YRC, they can apply for and receive TARP funding, all must be good. The other "solid" positive:
Of the most seriously troubled retail markets (Southern California, Florida, Phoenix and Las Vegas), the only market that seems to have improved somewhat is Southern California. We still hear very distressing things about the other markets.
Nothing like Californians spending with reckless abandon, concurrently with voting down Schwarzenneger's hail mary proposals to scrape up some semblance of a budget. Next stop: California's utter fiscal collapse, and Geithner fixing that problem as well, by securitizing all default credit cards through a AAA rated TALF issue. Now, as for that foreclosure moratorium ending in Cali - don't worry, TurboTaxTim has that covered as well: banks will hold those shadow homes on their books until such time as 10% inflation has set in and debt is worthless, just in time to reflate the next Inland Empire housing bubble. Nothing is f****d here.

Among the bullet points presented by Schmidt, who after all has to maintain some semblance of objectivity, are the following stabiliziation zingers:
  • Low attendance at annual ISCS Spring Convention shows pain
  • Leasing with already constructed projects are a priority
  • Few see recovery to positive NOI until 2010 or later
  • Downturn accelerating bifurcation of shopping centers
  • Detroit sales finally succumbs to downward pressures
  • Asset sales still hard to come by
  • Greater emphasis on service tenants
  • Thinking outside of the box becomes a necessary skill-set
  • Store closing selections may surprise outsiders
So, yes, aside from all these points, retail REITs are certainly on the road to stabilization.

Lastly, and most curiously, is the reported departure of Ross Nussbaum, yet another Bank Of America/ML REIT banker to go to... UBS, which just yesterday had virtually its entire REIT team poached by Bank Of America itself. Is this tango merely normal Wall Street rotations, or is it indicative of something deeper at Bank Of America. People are still scratching their heads over Steve Sakwa's departure. Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

REIT Analyst Leaves Bank Of America In Midst Of Most Lucrative Period For Group

Steve Sakwa, whose work product Zero Hedge has not spared its praise for in the past, has left the building. The "top rated" REIT analyst, who gained prominence in the past 2 months for such great work as an upgrade of virtually all companies he covers, has departed for greener, although unknown, pastures. It is quite odd that Sakwa would leave the bank at a time when his group was generating more revenue than virtually any analyst/trading group on Wall Street.

His pastoral style will be missed, if briefly, as he will be replaced by not one, but five REIT analysts that have jumped ship at UBS and are coming to Merrill. Seeing how the banks has generated over $100 million in revenue from REIT underwritings since March 9, it may have even been so generous as to give the UBS team some very sweet guarantees.

Zero Hedge will now focus on his legacy partner, Craig Schmidt, who has been oddly quiet lately with very few companies under coverage left that could get a bump in their price targets.

From Bloomberg:
Steve Sakwa, the top-rated analyst of U.S. real estate investment trusts, left Bank of America Corp. and the lender hired five analysts from UBS AG.

The analysts joining Bank of America include Jeffrey Spector, who was named head of the REIT research team, and James Feldman and Michelle Ko, hired as senior analysts, Bank of America said today in a statement. Lindsay Schroll andAndrew Ryu join as associates. Carrie Gray, a spokeswoman for Bank of America, confirmed Sakwa’s departure in a telephone interview.
“You’re getting a proven commodity that’s able to hit the ground running quickly if that’s what you’re looking for,” said Jeffery Harte, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners LP in Chicago.

U.S. REITs including SL Green Realty Corp. and Vornado Realty Trust have raised more than $10 billion from share sales this year to pay debt and take advantage of buying opportunities as property prices fall and weaker REITs fail or are forced to sell assets. The 111-member Bloomberg REIT Index is down 13 percent so far this year and commercial property prices fell 21 percent in March from a year earlier, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

Sakwa was named the top analyst in Institutional Investor magazine’s “All-America Research Team.” He estimated in a December report that U.S. REITs would pay out $11 billion in dividends this year and a similar amount in 2008. That’s down from about $13 billion in 2007, according to the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts in Washington.
Merrill Lynch

Sakwa worked for Merrill Lynch & Co. when Bank of America, the biggest U.S. lender by assets, bought the securities firm in January. Banc of America Securities-Merrill Lynch Global Research, the unit that hired the UBS REIT team, has hired 12 analysts in the U.S. and another 23 worldwide since January, Bank of America said in today’s statement.

Spector and his UBS team were named among the “runners- up” in the Institutional Investor
All-America Research Team survey last year. Sakwa and his team were named the top analysts. The “second team” went to Citigroup Inc. and the “third team” was Barclays Plc.
Messages left at Sakwa’s Bank of America number and a private number were not immediately returned.

UBS spokeswoman Allison Chin-Leong declined to comment on why the REIT group left the firm. UBS does plan to have coverage of REITs in the future, Chin-Leong said.

Gray declined to comment on Sakwa’s departure beyond confirming it.

Craig Schmidt, senior U.S. REIT analyst at Banc of America Securities-Merrill Lynch since 1995, will report to Spector and remain in his current position, according to today’s Bank of America statement.

hat tip IMA5U
Sphere: Related Content

Monday, January 26, 2009

Bartiromo: Update on Thain Office Scandal

Maria Bartiromo is trying to steal Gasparino's thunder by posting the latest update in the Thain commode saga. Per an internal memo, the former Merrill CEO is finally being contrite and will pay back the $1.2 million that he spent on the office renovations. He couches it by saying this the expenses were incurred over a year ago "when it was a different environment", and included, in addition to his office, two conference rooms and a reception area... not sure how that makes it better per se...

Additionally, he states that he only learned about MER's losses at the same time as BofA. Probably goes to show just how very involved in MER's wheelings and dealings he was. Sphere: Related Content