Monday, April 6, 2009

Vornado Chairman Warns Of Very Difficult 2009 and 2010

Vornado Chairman Steven Roth has released a letter to shareholders in which he warns of a very difficult environment going forward. Note the warnings for CMBS and whole loan holders.

Excerpted from letter:

2009 and likely 2010 will be very difficult in the property markets. Asset values are deflating, which will cause disruption and losses to the holders of CMBS and whole loans. In the private markets, this is playing out in slow motion. But, it has already played out at warp speed in the public markets. Private market transaction activity, where there is an insurmountable spread between bid and ask, has ground to a complete halt; on the other hand, trading volumes in public real estate equities have tripled. It is likely that the adjustment in REIT stock prices is complete (or has even overshot) while the adjustment in private market prices has barely begun. Just for kicks, we ran a screen showing the share price for 120 or so REITs, where a full half of these companies trade at a single digit – call them hat sizes.
******

We are in the income-producing property business. We invest for the long term. We invest in properties which will benefit from ever-rising income streams.So our mission is to generate a constantly rising same-store income stream. We do this by buying under market rents, occasional ground-up development,redevelopment and, importantly, continuously improving our assets. But most importantly, we do it by buying scarce assets which will perform at better than inflation rates. For example, they are not making more real estate on New York’s Park Avenue, Fifth Avenue, Sixth Avenue or Washington’s K Street(whereas more gold comes out of the mines everyday – and gold pays no dividends).
Amusingly, his optimism is contradicted by the following paragraph, also presented in the letter:
Many shareholders applauded our action recognizing the benefit to our balance sheet. Some shareholders were critical, believing that a balance sheet “have” such as Vornado should continue to pay our dividend all in cash, come hell or high water. I disagree. This action was taken out of deep respect for the severity of the economic crisis, the frozen capital markets and the uncertainty of the future. Further, the simple fact is shareholders who wish, can sell their dividend shares and be in exactly the same place, by and large. Nor do I agree with those who say we are paying a pro-rata stock dividend where a constant enterprise value is merely represented by more pieces of paper. In our case, the enterprise value is greater by the $400 million retained.


VNO Letter zerohedge

Sphere: Related Content

GGP Stock On Fire, Company Pleads Ignorance

The company has announced that as a result of the unusual market activity in the common stock, the New York Stock Exchange contacted GGP and requested the issuance of a public statement indicating whether there are any corporate developments that might explain the unusual activity. The company announces it is not aware of any corporate developments that might explain the unusual market activity. Maybe Ackman hired one of the laid off Simmons algo guys who is experiementing with the "never sell" program trade.

Sphere: Related Content

Is The Government Trying To Lose Taxpayer Money In Its GM Investment?

...Or the case for Equitable Subordination of the U.S. Treasury's GM Claim

The US Treasury lent $13.4 billion to General Motors on December 31, 2008. The loan documentation (full contract here) is curious in several respects (beyond the obvious dangers to capitalism).

1. Although styled as a secured loan, the document clearly acknowledges that there are numerous other senior security interests ahead of it. Also, normally such documents loudly proclaim the ranking of the debt being created, but this document seems silent on the topic, so most likely it will rank as senior unsecured debt, except for those few assets not otherwise tied down.

2. The other curious things are the recitals, which in this case include the expression of the parties to have GM use the loan proceeds to: (a) develop a viable and competitive business, (b) make energy efficient cars, (c) preserve American jobs, (d) safeguard retiree benefits, (e) make more cars.

While the politics of the recitals is certainly understandable, from a contract perspective, they raise some interesting questions. Acknowledging the need to become viable raises the question of whether GM was insolvent or in the “Zone of Insolvency” at the time of the loan. If so, there are serious implications for the ability of the government to collect on the loan. Suggestions about embarking into Venture Capital Land with untried energy efficient cars, not only smacks of disregarding the company’s duty to all creditors (including retirees), but also of a general breakdown of normal corporate governance. Preserving jobs and retiree benefits is exactly what got GM into the pickle it is in, so this notion runs counter to everything else in the document.

OK, let’s overlook the politics and the vague seniority, to give this document the benefit of a Senior, Partially Secured Loan. What has happened since the loan was made?

1. Treasury gave GM an extension to meet the business plan deadlines.
2. Treasury saw the need to add its own 110% (plus 15% from GM) to back the warranty on new cars
3. THEY FIRED THE CEO!

Again, not bad politics, but, their insolvency counsel (now Cadwalader) must be going nuts! Creditors who meddle in the affairs of a corporation are subject to something called Equitable Subordination. This is explicitly part of the Bankruptcy Code in section 510(c) (see statute text here), and allows the judge to throw the debt of certain creditors to the bottom of the stack – in some cases below even the equity!

Collier on Bankruptcy is the most authoritative source, but in very summarized fashion:

1. Equitable Subordination is not part of statutory or case law, but rather part of the equitable powers of the Bankruptcy judge.

2. There is a three pronged test:

a. The creditor must have acted badly
b. The other creditors must have suffered harm
c. Equitable Subordination must not be inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code

An easy way to meet part (a) of the test is for a lender to exert “actual or effective control” over the company, such as, for example, FIRING THE CEO.

An easy way to meet part (b) of the test is for the lender to force the company do something like: make energy efficient (but unprofitable) cars, preserve American jobs (which they can’t afford), safeguard retiree benefits (which they can’t afford), or better yet, let treasury prime all the unsecured creditors when everyone knows they were already insolvent (fraudulent conveyance).

Part (c) of the test is easiest, the creditor who broke all the rules (Treasury) must pay the ultimate price: their claim is expunged.

Of course all of this legal analysis at 30,000 feet is pointless. Why? Because the only entities who still own GM bonds are: Money Market Mutual Funds (who are already guaranteed by the Treasury, so they don’t care); Banks (who already are under TARP control of the Treasury, so they don’t care); Hedge Funds (who probably paid less than 20% of par, so nobody will feel sorry for them). In fact, maybe Treasury actually wants to be Equitably Subordinated. This is just another way to print money and direct industrial policy! And PLEASE, don't anybody suggest that we aren't going to bankruptcy court.

Big hat tip to Lookout

Sphere: Related Content

Textron Up On Takeover Speculation

Everyone's favorite Cessna maker which recently was plumbing all time stock price lows after it was made clear that no corporate CEO will ever be allowed to buy a private jet ever again, was up a whopping 10% today on takeover speculation, to $8.00. This is likely not much of a consolation to longs, as TXT was trading north of $60 a year ago. Bloomberg quotes reputable sources such as Michael Nasto, senior trader at U.S. Global Investors who wrote in an e-mail "We are hearing the stock is up on takeover rumors." Ah, the good old days back in 2006/07 of rumor mongering in acquisitions... Been a while since we have seen that. Jon Najarian feeds to the rumor stating Lockheed Martin may make a bid.

Why not throw any company in the aerospace sector as a potential bidder as well? Oh yeah, that little thorn on the side known as Textron Financial. Good luck to any acquiror in passing Textron Financial as too big to fail ala GECC. Textron still has the privilege of being a one of the widest names in the IG12 index. Sphere: Related Content

New York To Become Ghost Town After Largest Tax Hike In History?

And two months ago one would have been almost tempted to believe David Paterson that he "will never increase taxes." Too bad that like every other politician, a little time and a ridiculous budget deficit is all it took for the governor to flip on his promise.

The New York State budget is a not a good omen for its public sector finances or the business community. Yes, the starting point was a tough one: the deficit to close was 13% of revenues, state tax collections are plummeting, it will soon cost more to take the subway than to rent a limo, and the recession is deep. But the reliance on individual and business tax increases over spending cuts may have long-term costs when you consider the following:
  • New York already has the highest personal tax burden per capita and thehighest corporate taxes per capita in the country
  • New York also already has the highest spending per capita. One example: New York Medicaid spending per capita is 45% higher than the next closest state.

So the budget, which failed to enact any significant spending reductions or fiscal reforms, is a disappointment. New York's spending appears out of control relative to its ability to sustain it, particularly once federal transfers run out. From a pure operating cost perspective, some businesses and individuals may be incented to relocate elsewhere, hence the titles on the following very troubling charts. They show where New York ranks on taxes and spending, even before the recent tax hikes which constitute the biggest tax increase in NYS history.

hat tip reader Mike.



Sphere: Related Content

Mort Zuckerman Suing Ezra Markin Over Madoff Losses

Boston Properties chairman Mort Zuckerman has had enough, and according to Bloomberg has filed lawsuit against Ezra Merkin and Gabriel Captial for Madoff related losses. Mortimer, who owns 2.5 million shares in BXP, likely doesn't have much to worry about as long as BXP stock trades above $40/share keeping him planted nicely in the billionaire club. Whether this Forbes-eligible condition persists, only time will tell.

The Mortimer lawsuit is for a $40 million loss, has claims of fraud and negligent representation and seeks unspecified punitive damages. Mort claims:

“Merkin represented that he ‘exercised reasonable care’ in selecting managers and made ‘periodic reviews. There is no way Merkin could make such a representation without learning basic facts about Madoff’s operation, including the fact that Madoff had not made any stock purchases for at least 13 years.” He claimed that Merkin had a “huge incentive not to disclose Madoff’s role, especially to investors like Zuckerman,” because he charged clients “substantial fees” to manage both his Ascot Partners LP and Gabriel Capital.
Sphere: Related Content

Angelo Gordon Poaches Arthur Peponis From Goldman

Arthur Peponis, a senior GS banker who used to advise PE firms on LBO deals and helped originate over 150 deals while at Goldman, identifying $3 billion in investments, has left the firm to join Angelo Gordon. AG, best known for distressed debt investments, real estate and mortgage securities as well as the big bin of Dramamine in the middle of the trading floor (largest holders of SRS ETF as of December 31) is likely planning on expanding into private equity. The timing of this expansion may be a little questionable. Sphere: Related Content

UK To Provide Liquidity To US?

Just made headlines: Bank of England announces swap arrangement to provide liquidity to US Federal Reserve.

We agree - the US will need all the liquidity it can get.

Update: as is usually the case, Headline writers always invert the facts: turns out these are reciprocal swaps with 5 central banks that would provide foreign currencies to U.S. financial institutions for a total amount of roughly $180 billion. Hmm - is the world running out of non-dollars?

Here is the full press release from the Fed.
The Federal Open Market Committee has authorized new temporary reciprocal currency arrangements (foreign currency liquidity swap lines) with the Bank of England, the ECB, the Bank of Japan, and the Swiss National Bank. If drawn upon, these arrangements would support operations by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity in sterling in amounts of up to £30 billion, in euro in amounts of up to €80 billion, in yen in amounts of up to ¥10 trillion, and in Swiss francs in amounts of up to CHF 40 billion.
Sphere: Related Content

USA = ENRON 2.0

It made frontrunning, but I have been re-reading this post by Rortybomb like hypontized.

Explains the government's fascination with acronyms instead of the real names for the different plans: “Forney Perpetual Loop”, “Ricochet”, “Ping Pong”, “Black Widow”, “Red Congo”, “Get Shorty.”

Everyone should read this post. Sphere: Related Content

Fun Fact Of The Day

Trailing multiple on reported S&P 500 earnings is now... 100x!

This is a record, and double where it was during the tech bubble.

More facts: consumer discrtionary P/E multiple have expanded to post-2002 highs after a 40% rally from March lows.

AAII survey shows share of bulls has surged from 18.9% to 42.7%, same as levels in January when last "bull market" rally ended.

If the market's estimate of $70 forward earnings is off a tad, watch out below.

Sphere: Related Content

Mike Mayo: The Seven Deadly Sins Of Banking

Seven Deadly Sins of Banking: take home notes

Higher Structural Risk
  • The seven deadly sins of banking include greedy loan growth, gluttony of real estate, lust for high yields, sloth-like risk management, pride of low capital, envy of exotic fees, and anger of regulators.
  • To a degree, each reflects a way that banks tried to compensate for lower natural rates of growth by taking more risk.
  • The effect was to front-load earnings only to have back-ended costs, the brunt which is getting felt today. The consequences of this risk, while not new, seem only midstream and have more to go.
Cyclical pressures
  • We expect loan losses to loans to increase from 2% to 3.5% by year-end 2010 given ongoing problems in mortgage and an acceleration in cards, consumer credit, construction, commercial real estate and industrial.
  • Pre-tax, pre-provision profits should get hurt more than in the past given a greater portion of market sensitive fees, higher deposit insurance, and fall-out from a higher risk securities portfolio, as well as a historically high starting level of consumer debt.
  • Most of our estimates are below consensus.
Government actions are a Catch-22
  • The government can go easy on the banks but, if so, would leave many of the toxic assets on balance sheet (at least as it relates to loans vs. securities).
  • Alternatively, overly tough actions will trigger the need for large capital raises by the banks.
  • Relaxation of mark-to-market accounting rules impacts balance sheets by only one-quarter to one-third or less and, where it could impact, reflects a potential artificial accounting-induced capital injection that does not change the economics.
The crux of the problem according to Mayo: 5.5% projected cumulative losses on loans. On a $7 trillion base, this implies $250-$400 billion annual losses, or $650-$1 trillion over three years. This should be no surprise to our readers. Also as a reference point: Mayo estimates loans are marked down to only 98 cents on the dollar on average (compared to low-mid 90s per Goldman). We reference readers to our post from two weeks ago discussing this very issue.

Sphere: Related Content

Loans Versus Bonds Relative Value: April 6

Yet another improvement in average loan and bond spreads from a weeks ago, when loans were 839 bps and bonds averaged 1574 bps. The Alliance Imaging negative basis is over, with the -15 bps spread last week flipping to a positive 75 bps basis: a nice pickup of 90 bps in a week.

No other notable movers in the 30 name index. If things change markedly, we will notify you.

Sphere: Related Content

Biggest Loan Movers: Week Of March 29

Sphere: Related Content

Frontrunning: April 6

  • S&P 500 can't see enough money to feed stocks' rally: Must read (Bloomberg)
  • Mike Mayo says bank loan losses will exceed great depression levels, slashes bank sector ratings (Bloomberg)
  • Deflation in Europe accelerates (HT reader anonymous: Bloomberg)
  • Evans-Pritchard: Swiss slide into deflation next chapter in global crisis (Telegraph)
  • Tim Geithner brings the Enron Death Star strategy global: Must read (Rortybomb)
  • IBM - Sun deal talks stall (FT)
  • At D.E. Shaw, Larry Summer worked just one day a week (NYT)
  • Altman: this will not be a normal traditional depression (FT)
  • Implications of copper's declining demand (Bloomberg)
  • Samuelson: China engages in dollar deception (WaPo)
  • Putin plans $90 billion stimulus plan [ed. where is all this money coming from?] (Bloomberg)
  • Japan: time for return to QE [oh whatever, let's just all print money] (FT)
  • Another opinion: Greenspan not to blame for housing crisis (Forbes)
  • Largest winning streak since 1933 (B.I.G.)

Thanks to Dr. Housing Bubble for the donation Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Copper demand outlook in the short term

Tyler and I are thinking of redoing the 4th floor at ZH headquarters and to figure out when to do it, we were looking at copper futures on COMX (which is what normal people do... right?)

Below is a chart for a HG N9 contract (high grade copper for delivery on July 2009, which is one of the more liquid contracts currently out there):
















The price of copper has largely followed the trajectory of many other markets. As we stated, we don't think we are close to the bottom (despite the recent equity rally) but copper looks susceptible to a particularly sharp correction as equity and commercial real estate numbers worsen. With real estate (new construction) looking to get worse before it gets better and electronics of all kinds seeing almost universal demand pressures, it's tough to see any major upside. The only potential savior is China going ahead with expansion in the face of a terrible export outlook and its reserves getting spanked by the dollar; not the most bankable sentiment.
Sphere: Related Content

Congressional Budget Office Doubles Estimated TARP Cost To $356 Billion

In what should likely be a much more publicized piece of information, the Congressional Budget Office doubled the projected cost of the TARP bailout plan to $356 billion, versus an earlier estimate of $189 billion: an increase of $167 billion on the taxpayer's dime. According to the March CBO report, the total revised deficit under the Obama budget will hit $1.8 trillion in 2009 (and then never go negative pretty much in perpetuity, in other words deficit forever):



Among the main adjustments in the inner projection years (2009 and 2010) is the increased assumption in TARP costs: $152 billion in 2009 and $15 billion in 2010. Curiously, the CBO is also projecting a substantial increase in FNM and FRE costs: $52 billion and $5 billion in the respective years.




On page 8 of the CBO report, the reason for the astounding increase in TARP costs is given:
Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Since January, CBO has raised its estimate of the net cost (on a present-value basis) of the transactions covered by the TARP by $152 billion for 2009 and by $15 billion for 2010. Those revisions stem from three factors—changes in financial market conditions, new transactions, and a small shift in the anticipated timing of disbursements. Since CBO’s previous estimate was completed, market yields on securities issued by the firms that have received TARP funds have increased, thereby boosting the estimated subsidy cost of the Treasury’s purchases of preferred stock, asset guarantees, and loans to automakers. Also, the Treasury announced additional deals with Bank of America and American International Group (AIG) as well as participation of up to $50 billion in the Administration’s foreclosure mitigation plan, all of which involve subsidy rates that are higher than the averages in the previous baseline.
If it took a mere couple of months for projected TARP costs to double for taxpayers, ZH can't wait to see what the final cost will be as calculated by the CBO will be in another 9-12 months.

I recommend readers flip through the entire CBO report not only for the pretty charts, but to see the slow motion trainwreck our economy is becoming, based on current insane spending projections, which dig the economy into a hole so deep that there is nothing in conventional finance that could possibly pull it out absent eventual hyperinflation or sovereign default.

Sphere: Related Content

One potential option for hedge fund regulation

ZH has closely been covering and providing commentary on the publicly released details of Geithner's "New Rules of the Game"; a couple of posts by Rick Bookstaber (here and here) make a convincing case for the most effective way to limit future market risk. Basically, much of the criticism leveled against the risk management industry has typically been lazy accusations that risk managers still believe that markets follow a normal distribution/don't understand fat tail risk. Given that even college juniors looking for internships can recite Taleb in their sleep, it seems unlikely at this point that this is the major knowledge gap in our system. Rick goes on to point out that for more effective risk management, we need to get beyond the "hey, be careful, something may happen" mode of thinking, into something more actionable.

The proposal therefore is a central body that has access to all the exposures of banks, large funds and other systemically important players. By seeing the positions and correlations, this central body could hypothetically spot seemingly uncorrelated unwinds ahead of time and provide guidance on how to avoid it.

ZH thinks this is a great idea in theory but has reservations about practical implementation. Basically, the architect of this system is facing a trade off between asking for increasingly proprietary trade positions from banks and hedge funds, and the ability of the central body to pull out these correlations. Given that this central body is likely to be a federal agency, paying federal salaries and benefits, it's unlikely that they will be drawing the brightest minds who are capable of coming up with innovative ways to see correlation links between extremely disparate asset classes across disparate market players from limited trade information. The other option is to legislate mandatory position reporting that is much more detailed than hedge funds are even considering right now; basically, to make it easier for the not-as-smart-as-if-they-were-being-paid-more regulatory employees to see the linkages.

This could see some pretty drastic moves by hedge funds and even internal proprietary bank desks to do as much as possible to evade the reporting standards. The publicly stated reason of course would be that these super secret hedge funds do not want to divulge their highly proprietary and ridiculously complex trade strategies. The cynics among us might argue that they simply don't want to be unveiled as glorified vol sellers and/or leveraged mutual funds.

In summary, it seems reasonable that Geithner & Co. have something similar in mind to what Rick mentions as a way to improve regulation going forward but there are three options to consider:

1) Pay more to get smart people into these regulatory jobs and face the music as politicians moan about those overpaid regulatory guys.

2) Impose extremely high position reporting standards to make it easier to find the hidden correlations in our markets and watch the hedge fund industry duck and weave to avoid this.

3) Do neither 1 or 2 and hope and pray that next time we'll get lucky. Sphere: Related Content

CaliSTRSnication

A week ago ZH attempted to present the behind the scenes gimmicks at CalPERS, which, with its $53 billion in PE committed capital, I claimed, is a critical pillar of support for the private equity community. To our readers at Bloomberg and elsewhere, I follow up by providing the detailed private equity portfolio at CalPERS sister fund: CalSTRS, or the California State Teachers' Retirement System. CalSTRS is the nation's second largest public pension fund, holding over $113.7 billion at February 28, 2009. Seeing how some of the major names in the $37 billion PE portfolio are the who's who of private equity firms getting majorly washed on the 2005-2007 LBO wave, it is no wonder that CalSTRS is using the same generic J-curve excuse and "long-term" IRR calculations to avoid the interim fluctuations that CalPERS uses.
IRR Over Time

The actual IRR performance of any limited partnership is not known until the final liquidation of the partnership, typically over 10 to 12 years. Until the liquidation takes place, the IRR is only an interim estimated return.

The IRR calculated for a partnership in the first three years of its life are relatively meaningless given the "J-curve effect." The J-curve phenomenon is the effect of the cash-flow behavior of a partnership. It can be summarized as the first year's investment expenses of investing in a fund that has yet to harvest its capital gains in the future. This normally translates into a negative IRR in the early years of the fund. The plot of the partnership values over time generally resembles a letter J.

Unfortunately, no excuse will make up for a default wave in the PE investment portfolio as much as CalSTRS may desire the opposite, because once equity becomes worthless, it stays worthless. As such, the "plot of the partnership value over time" will generally resemble the letter L.

I present the full CalSTRS PE portfolio below for our readers' enjoyment. Notable top five investments by capital committed:

Texas Pacific Group: $3.1 billion
Blackstone: $2.9b billion
CVC Capital Partners: $1.9 billion
Welsh Carson: $1.8 billion
Permira: $1.7 billion


Publish at Scribd or explore others:

Hat tip reader Lookout for pointing out
Sphere: Related Content

Exposing The Utter Hypocrisy Of The FDIC, And How Andy Beal Is Making A Killing Off It

For all those who feel like punching their monitor or TV every time the administration says that the legacy loan program is fair and equitable at a transaction price in the 80-90 cent ballpark, we have some news for you (that will likely make the half life of said monitor or TV even shorter).

But first, there has been a lot of speculation about where banks have marked their commercial loan portfolios. Zero Hedge had previously discovered and disclosed interpretative data from Goldman, which concluded that the major banks were still stuck in a fairytale world where these loans were marked in the 90+ ballpark, a far, far cry from where comparable loans would clear in the market. Of course, FDIC's head Sheila Bair (who many WaMu shareholders lately do not feel too hot about) had some interpretative voodoo of her own, claiming the bid offer disconnect is purely due to a lack of liquidity and access to financing:
"It has been clear for some time that troubled loans and securities have depressed market perceptions of banks and impeded new lending. Difficult market conditions have complicated efforts to sell these troubled assets because potential buyers have not had access to financing. The Legacy Loans Program aligns the interests of the government with private investors to provide financing and market-based pricing, and is a critical step forward in the process of restoring clarity to the markets. While there are inherent challenges to implementing a program of this magnitude quickly, the framework announced today provides the foundation upon which the FDIC will begin to build immediately."
So it came as a big surprise that none other than the FDIC keeps a track of where commercial loans clear in its own internal auctions. In a relatively obscure part of the FDIC's website, there lies a little gem of disclosure, which exposes all the rhetoric by Sheila Bair and by other members of the administration as hypocrisy on steroids. We bring you: FDIC's closed loan sales database. Zero Hedge took the liberty of compiling some of the data for the benefit of our readers: we picked a data sort of all closed commercial loan auctions from January 1, 2009 to February 28, 2009, to see just at what level these would close. Of course, we highly recommend our readers recreate these results.
|
The results: 43 commercial loan auctions, of which 39 were for exclusively performing (so not non-performing, or lower quality auctions, and by implication free cash generating), consisting of 331 total loans, representing $206 million in face value, ended up clearing for a $103 million price, a 49.3% discount, or a 50.7% clearing price! That's right, the FDIC itself clears performing commercial loans at 50 cents on the dollar on average in its own regulated, orderly auctions. One would assume the chairman of the very agency that conducts these loan auctions would be aware of them and would at least reference or mention these results in her numerous public appearances.



Curiously, the FDIC also discloses the winning bidders. The surprising recurring result: a little known (but deserving much greater attention) company known as Beal Bank (and its LNV Corporation subsidiary). In the first two months of the year alone, Beal Bank, and more specifically its owner Andy Beal, has won $73 million face value of auctions, for a price of $43 million- a clearing price of 59%. Another way of looking at it is that Beal accounts for 35% of all FDIC auctions.

Just who is Andy Beal, aside from a prolific and profitable poker-playing, college-dropout of course? A great question, which Forbes goes into great detail answering this weekend. We paraphrase the key points from Forbes:
Standing outside the glass-domed headquarters of his Plano, Texas, bank in March, D. Andrew Beal presses a cellphone to his ear. He's discussing a deal to buy mortgage securities. In just a few minutes, the deal's done: His Beal Bank will buy $15 million of face value for $5 million. A few hours earlier he reviewed details on a $500 million loan his bank is making to a company heading into bankruptcy--the biggest he's ever done. A few floors above, workers are bent over computer screens preparing bids for chunks of $600 million in assets dumped by two imploded financial firms. In the last 15 months, Beal has purchased $800 million of loans from failed banks, probably more than anyone else.
It is amusing that Beal Bank, which is not large enough to qualify for the FDIC's zombie bank life-support program known as TLGP, is beating the FDIC at its own game, gobbling up assets (at fair market prices, which is what auction outcomes are by definition). Beal is such a non-mainstream individual that Project Zero will hold a honorary bunk in his favor, (he will have to decide who gets top with Chuck Bowsher) until such time as he decides to stand outside ZH headquarters for 24 hours to gain admission:
It's hard to imagine Beal fitting in at a bankers' convention. He walked into the Las Vegas Bellagio in 2001 and challenged the world's best poker players to games with $2 million pots--the highest stakes ever. Donning large sunglasses and earphones, Beal held his own against the poker stars, once winning $11 million in a single day, although he shrugs that he lost more than he won. At the track he'll drive one of his nine race cars (costing as much as $100,000 each) at 150 mph. On city streets he cruises in a huge Ford Excursion, the vehicle that has made him feel safe since a drunk driver punctured his lungs in 2000.
However, the main reason why Beal is prophetic beyond his years is the following:
He thinks the government is going to be "disappointed" by its various programs to revive lending. He says Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's new plan to guarantee loans to buyers of toxic assets won't lead to many sales because the problem isn't liquidity but price. They are not low enough. Half the country's banks--4,000 in all--would be bust, he says, if they marked their loans to what the loans would fetch in an auction. He says banks are fooling themselves by refusing to mark busted assets down.

"Banks are on a prayer mission that somehow prices will come back and they won't have to face reality," Beal says. And that reality, according to Beal, is going to get a lot worse. "Unemployment is going over 10%, commercial real estate hasn't even begun collapsing and corporate credit defaults are just getting started," he says. His prediction: depression, without bread lines this time, thanks to the government safety net, but with equal cost to society.

It is a fitting conclusion that Beal himself is the winning bidder in FDIC's commercial loan auctions (which no other major bank with a $ trillion+ balance sheet has any interest in participating in - why is this if the loans are worth 90 cents as Citi et al have them market internally?), and thus the true market test of what all these toxic legacy loans are really worth. Zero Hedge wholeheartedly agrees with Beal that the CRE situation is headed for a cliff at 120 mph, and that no matter how much hypocritical posturing and rhetoric the administration spouts, or how many more trillions in debt the U.S. incurs to revive the financial zombie on the morgue dissection table, there is nothing at this point that can be done to change the final outcome.

Sphere: Related Content

Master P Tastes, Gekko Returns

By Travis

We at Zero Hedge always strive to present you with profitable ideas, feeding the inner Gordon Gekko in us all. While “greed is good” it can most certainly lead to spending lavishly. But how many of us spend lavishly whilst spending wisely? By reading some of your comments- um, “not so much”- however, there’s still hope for some of you out there.

Spending money on baubles and toys can be fun (and it could get you laid in the right circles- remember Darryl Hannah?), when you lose your last Thomas Pink shirt to the market and have to liquidate all the crap you
bought (after the girlfriend grows fat and lazy, or you grow fat and lazy and she dumps you anyway) or you drop dead (after all, we all default to zero on a long enough timeline, right?) someone will find that not only did you lose your self worth, but to add insult to injury- some of the shit you thought was the “barter of last resort” even on a rainy day, really isn’t.

It's one of my many jobs to monitor the “price of poker” in many areas, and perhaps advise decent stores of value, so while its up to you to make money, maybe Tyler and Company can help you enjoy it more by spending it on the crap that really matters.

Buying material things is rarely an investment. Well, I have to skirt around the meaning of investment, true- anything you buy at a price and sell at a higher price can be labeled an “investment,” but if you lose money, well, that’s outright “depreciation?” Or is that a “bad investment?” Call it what you have to… Fine art, cars, jewelry, wristwatches, houses, property- these are all things on a long enough time line- while you default to zero- these things may appreciate. Maybe.

Take fine watches, they’re bought and sold daily, there’s even a market that looks to auction houses to set the tone- houses like Christies, Sotheby’s and Antiquorum. An excellent store of value that not only serves a valuable function- measuring the time by the second before we all default to zero- but in some cases can payoff in spades.

Antiquorum, the “Worlds Premier Watch Auctioneer” last week had their Spring Geneva Auction and despite a fledgling economy with even the Gordon Gekkos of the world not making and spending as much as they’d like to, posted impressive results- SFr 5,419,584 worth, or about $4.75 million.

Dually impressive was that about 78% of the some 481 lots sold, up slightly since the last auction earlier in March, which hammered down about 75%. So roughly one person in four is still walking away with his old crap, having to resort to the likes of eBay or the local pawn shop.

Auction highlights include a handful of complicated Patek Philippes, widely regarded as the blue chip/gold standard of collectible watches. Consistently earning strong six figure results in most any auction, regardless of venue or mere economic downturn, to quote Henry Hill from Goodfellas- they’re “better than Citibank.”

More notable was the surprising crown jewel of the March auction- a one-off Rolex Daytona Cosmograph from 1985. While these watches generally command around $25,000 in standard steel Ref. 6263 (not a bad rate of return either, considering they were about $1,500 new); this 18K example, custom Ref. 6270, encrusted in diamonds and sapphires went for a whopping SFr 360,000, or about $317,000. This wasn’t your typical bit of bling from 1985, but rather a bespoke factory reference purported one of about a handful made for the Sultan of Oman.

Generally bejeweled sport watches encrusted in rare metals and stones are rarely considered valuable (or in good taste) so before you run to the local Diamond Exchange for that clapped out Rolex only Master P would find appealing, think twice before you waste your money.

But remember, Antiquorum takes a buyer’s premium and commands a seller’s fee, sometimes totaling up to 20% at the end of the day. Like in the “price of poker,” most often “the house always wins.”


Sphere: Related Content